| |
 |
 By Linda Marsa for Latimes.
Though they've defeated the disease that could have taken their lives,
cancer survivors are often haunted by the specter of a fatal recurrence.
The fears are especially keen for patients with slow-growing malignancies,
such as those of the breast, because they never know if their cancer has
been truly eradicated. They can suffer relapses five, 10, even 20 years
later.
Although the risk of recurrence declines over time, it never disappears.
"When it comes back, patients are devastated because they thought they had
it licked," said Dr. Susan M. Love, a breast cancer surgeon at UCLA. And
when cancer recurs, it's usually more aggressive and more difficult to
treat.
Even using today's most precise prognostic tools, doctors are never sure
which cancers will remain dormant and which ones will spread. That may
change soon.
Screening techniques now under development may be able to identify the
worst malignancies. Such tests, which examine the cancer cells' genetic
makeup, would free people from this terrible uncertainty while sparing
patients with indolent tumors from undergoing needless treatments that
often have horrific side effects.
"These tests will revolutionize all cancer therapy," said Dr. Gabriel N.
Hortobagyi, chairman of the breast medical oncology department at the
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
Knowing that about 25% to 33% of women with operable breast cancer will
have a recurrence within five years of diagnosis, doctors currently must
gather circumstantial evidence, such as the size, shape, location and
microscopic appearance of cancer tumors, said Dr. Patricia A. Ganz,
director of Cancer Prevention and Control Research at UCLA's Jonsson
Cancer Center. Age can be a factor too: Premenopausal women tend to get
more aggressive cancers than older women.
Genetic clues can also indicate which breast cancers are more deadly. The
her-2 neu oncogene, for instance, which sparks virulent tumor growth, is
present in about 25% to 30% of women with breast cancer. Also, the more
advanced the cancer is (i.e., the higher its stage), the more likely it is
to recur.
Women with tiny tumors confined to the milk ducts, called ductal carcinoma
in situ, or DCIS, are often considered Stage 0 and are usually considered
cured after treatment. While the highest risk of recurrence is in the
first two years, even small Stage I cancers can reappear years later in a
more lethal form.
Stage IV breast cancer has the poorest prognosis; it involves tumors that
have spread to other parts of the body, such as bone, lung, liver and
brain.
But even these factors don't provide a clear map of the future.
"Some women with the most favorable tumors will relapse, while some women
with breast cancer that looks just awful will survive without a
recurrence," said Hortobagyi. "Each case is different."
Part of the problem is that remnants of cancer may remain after a tumor
has been cut out, triggering a relapse years later. Breast cancers also
grow slowly. Consequently, tumors may sit in the breast for seven to eight
years before they're large enough to be detected.
Doctors have no way of knowing if, during that time, malignant cells have
already hitched rides in the lymphatic system or blood vessels and set up
colonies in bones and vital organs such as the liver or lungs. When cancer
does recur, "the cells may have been continuously growing, or they became
dormant for a while and something wakes them up," Love said.
Because of this unknown, most women receive chemotherapy after their
surgery to prevent the cancer from spreading, even though studies have
shown that three-quarters of patients would do fine without this toxic
therapy. "With chemotherapy we can reduce risks of recurrence by about a
third," Ganz said.
Use of the drug tamoxifen, which blocks estrogen, a hormone that nurtures
the growth of about half of all breast cancers, also cuts relapse risk by
more than one-third. But again, it's unclear which women are being helped
and which ones are being subjected to unnecessary treatments.
Such uncertainties could be resolved through the use of the new
technology, called molecular profiling. In a study reported in January,
scientists at Merck & Co. and the Netherlands Cancer Institute studied the
genetic characteristics of 70 breast cancer patients, half of whom had a
recurrence. They discovered that a different set of genetic patterns
occurred for those with tumors that had spread throughout the body.
"Out of 25,000 genes, we were able to isolate several dozen genes that
were clues to recurrence," said Dr. Stephen H. Friend, a study coauthor
and a researcher at Merck in West Point, Pa.
It will take several years to refine this test, which probably won't be
used on patients for four to five years. "But with this technology we hope
to be able to forecast whose cancer will recur with a 90% degree of
certainty," said Friend.
In the meantime, doctors have made significant inroads in treating women
who relapse, and increasingly, their cancer can be managed like any other
chronic disease.

September 9, 2002.
|
|