| |
 |
 Appeared in NYT.
By JULIA PRESTON
UNITED NATIONS, Nov. 7 — The United States, supported by 36
other nations, blocked an initiative by Germany and France
today for a worldwide ban on cloning to create human beings,
insisting that the ban should include all forms of human
cloning.
The Bush administration made its move in a procedural motion
in a committee of the General Assembly, diplomats said. Rather
than move ahead with negotiations on the German and French
proposal, the Assembly's Sixth Committee, which deals with
international legal matters, decided by consensus to postpone
the cloning debate until September 2003.
The diplomats said that the committee acted after it was clear
that no general accord would be reached on either the French
and German proposal for a treaty banning only "reproductive
cloning of human beings," or on a competing resolution by the
United States and Spain calling for a ban on "human cloning"
across the board.
The ban proposed by the Bush administration would include
cloning of human embryos for medical research or therapy.
Germany made plain its frustration with the outcome.
"This leaves the field wide open to those working towards
giving birth to a cloned human being," said Christian Walter
Much, who read the German statement, which was also endorsed
by France. "It underlines that insisting upon far-reaching
principles sometimes leads to a situation which makes it
impossible to act effectively."
Berlin had hoped to move quickly, as a first step, to bar
cloning to create human babies, leaving the door open to a
broader ban later on.
American diplomats called the decision today an important
victory.
"We were pleased that we were able to reach a consensus that
on such a vital issue there needs to be continued work," said
Carolyn L. Willson, legal adviser to the American Mission
here. "We've seen momentum building for a total ban," she
added.
American officials argued that research cloning involves
creating embryos that later have to be destroyed. The
technique "raises profound ethical and moral questions and is
highly controversial," the United States said in a position
paper in February.

November 8, 2002.
|
|