| |
 |
 Appeared in NYT.
By AMY HARMON
Us colleges across the country seek to stem the torrent of
unauthorized digital media files flowing across their campus
computer networks, students are devising increasingly
sophisticated countermeasures to protect their free supply of
copyrighted entertainment.
Most colleges have no plans to emulate the Naval Academy,
which last week confiscated computers from about 100 students
who are suspected of having downloaded unauthorized copies of
music and movie files. But many are imposing a combination of
new technologies and new policies in an effort to rein in the
rampant copying.
"For our institutions this is a teachable moment," said
Sheldon Steinbach, general counsel of the American Council on
Education. "This is the time for them to step forward and
demonstrate the value of intellectual property."
Some students may well emerge from educational sessions on
copyright laws and electronic etiquette with a higher regard
for intellectual property rights. But many of them are honing
other skills as well, like how to burrow through network
firewalls and spread their downloading activities across
multiple computers to avoid detection.
"If you don't know how to do it, other people will just tell
you," said Lelahni Potgieter, 23, who learned her file-trading
techniques from an art student at her community college in Des
Moines. "There's not much they can do to stop you."
Nevertheless, university administrators are trying, spurred on
in part by a barrage of letters from entertainment companies
notifying them of student abuses. Many entertainment concerns
have hired companies to search popular file-trading networks
for unauthorized files and track them to their source.
More pragmatic motivations, like the expense of large amounts
of university's network bandwidth being absorbed by students'
proclivity for online entertainment, are also driving the
renewed university efforts.
Schools have closed off the portals used by file-trading
services, installed software to limit how much bandwidth each
student can use, and disciplined students who share media
files. But nothing, so far, has proved entirely effective.
"It's an ongoing battle," said Ron Robinson, a network
architect at Bradley University in Peoria, Ill. "It's an
administrative nightmare trying to keep up."
In a typical game of digital cat-and-mouse, Mr. Robinson said
one of his first moves was to block the points of entry, or
ports, into the network used by popular file-trading software
like KaZaA.
But the newest version of the KaZaA software automatically
searches for open ports and even insinuates itself through the
port most commonly used for normal Web traffic, which must be
kept open to allow some e-mail reading and other widely used
applications to take place uninterrupted.
Even without KaZaA's help, students say they can easily use
so-called port-hopping software to find a way past the
university's blockades. So Mr. Robinson has rationed the
amount of bandwidth that each student can use for file-trading
activities.
Software with names like PacketHound, from Palisade Systems,
or Packet Shaper, from Packeteer, enable network
administrators to distinguish data that comes from the
file-trading services and sequester it from the rest of the
Internet traffic.
But there are ways around that, too.
To limit the amount of data each student can download,
administrators typically link a student ID to the computer in
a dormitory room. To exceed those limits, some students find
computers registered to others and use them to conduct their
activities.
That practice has surfaced recently at Cornell University,
where the number of complaints from copyright holders about
unauthorized downloading in recent months has stayed at the
same level as last year, but the number of students who were
found to have been unwittingly downloading for others has
risen, according to university officials.
About 50 students at Cornell were disciplined last year for
unauthorized downloading, said Mary Beth Grant, the
university's judicial administrator. All of those cases
resulted from letters from copyright holders, because the
university does not monitor what students do with their
Internet access.
Nor does Cornell consider the trading of copyrighted music
files to be among the more serious infractions. Students are
typically required to perform a few hours of community
service.
"It's theft and you're not supposed to steal, but this is
different from someone engaging in credit card scams or
breaking into a building to steal a computer," Ms. Grant said.
"We're not in the business of trying to punish a student; we
want them to learn from their mistake."
Indeed, the push from copyright holders for universities to
police their networks has raised questions in the academic
world about how to instill students with a sense of morality —
and a knowledge of the law — about copyrights without
intruding on their privacy and free speech rights.
"The biggest problem that universities are having is they have
not openly decided whether their primary responsibility in
this regard is law enforcement or education," said Virginia
Rezmierski, who teaches in the University of Michigan's School
of Information and recently surveyed universities on their
monitoring practices. "Right now they're doing more monitoring
than education."

November 27, 2002.
|
|