| |
 |
 Appeared in Latimes.
A focus on forgetting memories too painful to remember
Scientists are examining the potential advantage of discarding
recollections -- and ways to bring it about.
By Martin Miller, Times Staff Writer
From rituals of remembrance to Post-it notes, humans struggle to preserve
memories. And no wonder. They are, after all, at the core of personal
identity.
Sometimes overlooked in the rush to remember, however, is the value of
forgetting. Though the research is in the early stages, scientists are
investigating the process, necessity and potential advantages of
discarding recollections.
"We'd be absolutely lost without our ability to forget," said Michael
Anderson, an associate professor of cognitive neuroscience at the
University of Oregon. "Just on a basic level, can you imagine if you
couldn't constantly update your memory? Do you want 10 years worth of
parking space memories and all your old phone numbers in your head?"
Much of the research is focused upon helping us deliberately forget
specific events. Two methods -- behavior changes and drugs -- have proved
at least moderately successful, suggesting that certain memories can
indeed be cast off. The benefits of perfecting such techniques are
enormous, say researchers. Combat veterans, abused children, car crash
victims, to name a few, could all be freed from severe emotional trauma by
eliminating the offending memory, or at least the emotional pain
associated with it, say researchers.
"We want to be able to keep the past from overly intruding on a patient's
life," said Roger Pittman, a professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical
School, who has worked extensively with victims of post-traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD). "When it preoccupies someone so much they can't
concentrate on their work, their families, their present lives, it can
ruin them."
Pittman's research found that emergency room patients who were given beta
blockers within six hours of a traumatic event were far less likely to
develop PTSD than those who did not. The treatment shows promise, Pittman
believes, because the medication interferes with the brain's ability to
properly establish a deeply embedded memory. The research was published
last year in the Journal of Biological Psychiatry. "The best outcome we
can hope for now is that when they remember the event, they take it in
stride, that it doesn't cause the upheaval it does now," said Pittman.
"It's a form of emotional forgetting."
Unwanted memories
Cracking the code of traumatic memory storage poses one of the greatest
challenges for researchers. Studies have shown that stressful events
release powerful hormones inside the brain that ensure the episode will be
vividly recalled. The more stressful, the more hormones flood the brain.
From an evolutionary standpoint, the response is critical for survival,
researchers say.
"That's why we can't remember where we were the morning of Sept. 10," said
Pittman, "but can on the morning of Sept. 11."
Behavior changes show promise as well in efforts to block unwanted
memories. A University of Oregon study found that students could actually
learn to obstruct selected memories, thus supporting a century-old
assertion by Sigmund Freud that humans are equipped with a memory
repression mechanism.
Students were first asked to memorize pairs of words in which the first
word would be a rough trigger to recall the second, such as "ordeal" and
"roach." Then, subjects were encourage to forget the second word. One
group tried to do this by thinking about the word and saying it aloud,
while another group was told to repress the word.
Trying to forget
The study had surprising results, said Anderson who is examining brain
structures during voluntary forgetting. The group that was constantly
reminded of the word could forget it, and the one that tried to obliterate
the memory failed, even when offered extra money to do so.
"Amazingly, this type of forgetting is more likely to occur when people
are continuously confronted with reminders to the very memory they are
trying to avoid," said Anderson who believes the dynamic is in action on a
national level regarding images of the World Trade Center.
"This is quite contrary to intuition. It's not enough to want to forget
something. You have to want to forget it and be forced to confront
reminders of it."
Such research is in its infancy, however, and scientists have trouble
agreeing on even the most basic propositions.
What does it mean to forget? Can an experience truly be forgotten or does
it simply lack the proper stimulus to come thundering back to the
conscious mind?
"It's very difficult to prove someone has permanently forgotten things as
opposed to being unable to recall it," said Anderson.
Some research into the nature of forgetting has lead to unexpected finds.
Larry Cahill of the Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory at
UC Irvine has discovered that men and women process traumatic events in
vastly different ways.
For reasons still unknown, women are twice as likely to experience PTSD as
men even though they've gone through the same painful episode.
"This is all pretty brand-new stuff," said Cahill, an assistant professor
of neurobiology and behavior. "The field is going to have to sift through
this. We're really a baby crawling in diapers, we're making good progress,
but there's far more that we don't know than we do."

March 31, 2003.
|
|