| |
 |
Thanks to recession and divorce, today’s college kids are determined
to break the rules about sex roles.  Appeared in Newsweek.
By Barbara Kantrowitz
May 12 issue — A few years ago, when the University of Connecticut
women’s basketball team first captured the NCAA title, a popular
bumper sticker declared the Storrs campus a place where the men are
men and the women are champions.
AND WITH THE LADY HUSKIES still stars, UConn students aren’t
afraid to break stereotypes. So last week senior Christopher Kyne, 22, was
confident about heading to South Carolina after graduation because his
girlfriend has a good job at the Medical University of South Carolina.
“We’re going on her money,” he says. He hopes to enter grad school and
become a teacher, partly because it’s a family-friendly career. In the
future, he says, “I’d be 100 percent satisfied if my wife made enough
money so I could be a stay-at-home dad.”
Openness to flexible roles in marriage and family distinguishes
this generation of college students from their parents, say researchers
who’ve studied their progress. The battle over whether mothers should work
is moot now; families need the money. Young women are more ready to pick
up the slack and the men feel less of a stigma if they stay home. Everyone
is desperate to avoid his parents’ mistakes. In the early 1980s, these
kids’ baby-boomer mothers swarmed into the work force without any of the
supports common today—maternity leave, part-time career paths, flexible
schedules. The children saw marriages crumble under the strain. They also
watched the economy ricochet. In the current downturn, many of their
fortysomething fathers are out of work with little chance of getting
rehired. In this context, rigid roles seem quaint, says Kathleen Gerson, a
sociologist at New York University who is writing a book called “The
Children of the Gender Revolution.” “If the economic opportunities are
there for the woman, fine. As long as they are there for somebody.”
They’re hopeful but pragmatic, and understand that the real world
can crush ideals. Many of these young women hope for a close family life,
but with nearly half of all marriages eventually ending in divorce,
they’re prepared to be breadwinners. “That’s a big thing for our age
group,” says Lucy Swetland, a 21-year-old junior who watched friends’
mothers struggle. Even though her parents are married, she’s learned that
“you can’t depend on someone else to carry you through.” Women still want
to have it all—although maybe not all at the same time. Jennifer
Carosella, a 21-year-old senior, is going to law school so she can earn a
six-figure income. But at some point, she also wants to be home with her
children—as her own mother was.
How comfortably the men adapt depends largely on the examples their
fathers set, says University of Chicago sociologist Barbara Schneider,
coauthor of “The Ambitious Generation.” UConn junior Alfred Guante, 21,
whose parents are divorced, was the main male figure in his household for
much of his childhood—and being responsible for his family is important to
him: “I think it’s a man’s role to get a job.” But unlike many men in
earlier generations, he would have no objections to his wife’s working as
well. Drama student Jeremy Andrews was inspired by his father, an engineer
who trained as a nurse. It was a backup when his company left town so he
could avoid dislocating his family. His father found another engineering
job, but rarely missed his four sons’ games, while his mother, a nurse,
worked long hours. That gives Andrews the confidence to try acting—even if
it doesn’t bring in a steady paycheck.
Rather than bemoan a legacy of social upheaval, this generation
seems determined to embrace possibilities. “You’re not stuck in what you
do,” says UConn sophomore Caitlin Fitzpatrick. “People have four or five
careers. There are so many opportunities.” Maybe this time, the balancing
act will work.

May 12, 2003.
|
|