| |
 |
 Appeared in NEWSWEEK.
‘I was not against marriage, I believed in it, in fact. It was
necessary to have one best friend in a hostile world...yet what
about all those other longings which after a while, marriage did
nothing much to appease?’ —Fear of Flying.
By Erica Jong
When I published “Fear of Flying” in 1973, women
were not supposed to publicly confess to sexual boredom in marriage.
It was rampant, of course. But as I was to discover (to my horror),
it is one thing to be a secret, silent adulterer and quite another
to be an adulterer on paper—especially if you are a woman—and “Fear
of Flying” humorously suggested that there might be sexual fantasies
about other partners even within marriage. My novel was passed from
hand to hand, read aloud in bed, pressed on boyfriends by
girlfriends and on girlfriends by boyfriends. Analysts recommended
it to their patients. Mothers kept it from their daughters—the best
PR a book can have. “Fear of Flying” made its way in the world, and
so did I.
NOW, 30 YEARS later, when every glossy mag promises to teach “101 Ways
to Drive Him (or Her) Wild in Bed,” you’d think that marriage would have
evolved into something lusty and liberated. But no, we still hear that sex
is dead, that exhaustion depletes libidos and that workaholic careers
leave no time for connubial canoodling.
Is it true? Must we never hope for that zipless encounter in the
five-star hotel with our beloved spouse, a bottle of Krug or Cristal and
beluga caviar? The problem with Americans is that, unlike the French, we
want all our emotional eggs in one basket. We crave passion, sex,
friendship and children all with the same partner. Can such miracles
occur? And if they occur, how long can they last? Two years? Time to
conceive the baby and swaddle it? Twenty years? Time to teach the baby
(almost) civilized behavior?
Since passion is about fantasy and marriage is about reality,
passion and marriage are the oddest of odd bedfellows. My own experience
has been that passion ebbs and flows in marriage. It is far more dependent
on romantic vacations and child-free weekends than we like to admit. And
when we do check into a fancy hotel with our spouse, as the women’s mags
recommend, we’re likely to start talking about whether the roof needs
fixing or the car needs tuning. After all, marriage with work and children
leaves little time for adult conversation. You might get to that hotel
room in the sky and use the time just to converse with your spouse. And
you might consider that a perfect evening.
Perhaps the problem is not in our marriages but in our
expectations. In our post-sexual-revolution era, we expect carnality and
familiarity wrapped up in the same shiny gift package. We would be much
happier and much more fulfilled if we changed those unrealistic
expectations. And our glossy mags would do well to stop teasing us while
pretending to be helping us.
The truth is that ziplessness has always been a Platonic ideal
rather than a daily reality. Yes, wild passionate sex exists. It can even
exist in marriage. But it is occasional, not daily. And it is not the only
thing that keeps people together. Talking and laughing keep couples
together. Shared goals keep couples together. If this were not true, how
would some couples survive illnesses, deaths of beloved family members,
even holocausts? The pair bond is strong. We are pair-bonding
creatures—like swans or geese. We can also be as promiscuous as baboons or
bonobos. Those are the two extremes of human sexuality, and there are all
gradations of chastity and sensuality in between. The glue that holds
couples together consists of many things: laughter, companionship,
tenderness—and sex. The busyness of marriage is real, but we also use it
to protect us from raw intimacy, from having to be too open too much of
the time. Pleasure is terrifying because it breaks down the boundaries
between people. Embracing passion means living with fear. “Love is a
breach in the walls, a broken gate,” wrote the poet Rupert Brooke. “Love
sells the proud heart’s citadel to fate.” Amen.

June 30, 2003.
|
|