| |
 |
 Appeared in NYT.
By MELINDA LIGOS
ADDICTION costs corporate America billions of dollars a year in lost
productivity, absenteeism and higher health care expenses. It also
derails many once-promising careers.
More companies are willing to offer assistance these days,
especially as they deal with higher levels of employee stress from
heightened workloads and job cuts. Yet many workers are still
reluctant to take advantage of this help, for fear of jeopardizing
their positions.
"Telling something so personal would have lessened my authority as a
leader," said a 65-year-old executive of a computer company in
Philadelphia who recently returned from 28 days of treatment for
alcoholism. "As a manager, you have to create some distance between
you and your employees." The executive, who spoke on condition of
anonymity, had arranged for the treatment himself at the Caron
Foundation, a rehabilitation center in Wernersville, Pa.
He says his job has been business as usual since his return last
spring, but he acknowledged making up a story about his extended
absence, which he even gave to his boss. "I told them I was
overstressed and my doctor asked me to rest for a month," he said.
Professionals in similar situations have many delicate issues to
navigate. How, for example, can they avoid being stigmatized by
colleagues? And how can they explain gaps on a résumé after a long
treatment period?
Many employees who receive treatment — whether for alcoholism or for
drug, gambling or food addictions — will undoubtedly have some
difficulties in the beginning, experts say, but as they recover, so
too will their careers.
Abuse of some drugs has been climbing in the workplace. According to
Quest Diagnostics, which provides workplace drug tests, the number
of workers and job applicants who tested positive for amphetamine
use rose 17 percent in 2002 from the previous year. At the Waismann
Institute, in Beverly Hills, Calif., 60 percent of the patients,
mostly high-powered business people, are addicted to painkillers
like OxyContin and Vicodin, up from about 10 percent four years ago,
according to Dr. Clifford A. Bernstein, the medical director there.
Given the weakness in the economy and the job market, none of this
surprises Dr. Kenneth Siegel, a psychologist and president of the
Impact Group, an executive leadership consulting firm in Beverly
Hills. In the economic downturn of the late 1980's and early 1990's,
he said, "Valium suddenly become the most prescribed drug in
America." Similarly, today's workers are seeking ways to curb their
anxieties and depression, he said.
"I don't think you're going to find a lot of C.E.O.'s smoking pot or
snorting cocaine in the company restroom," Dr. Siegel said, "but we
are seeing executives abusing alcohol and popping prescription
drugs."
One of the biggest difficulties is seeking help in the first place.
Managers may be surrounded by underlings who are more than willing
to help cover up the problem. A recent survey by the Caron
Foundation of its patients found that 75 percent of executives in
recovery said they had secretaries or assistants who went to great
lengths to cover for them. Ninety percent said their peers had to
work extra hours to compensate for their addiction.
Bruce Cotter, a recovering alcoholic, said that when he was a sales
executive for major television networks on the East Coast during the
1980's, his assistants would routinely reschedule his appointments
and even compile his sales reports. "I had a whole army of people
who would mop up my messes," he said. Mr. Cotter now runs Bruce W.
Cotter & Associates in Butler, Md., which intervenes on behalf of
companies to provide treatment for addicted executives.
Another issue is confidentiality. Many workers, particularly
executives, hesitate to seek help through their company's employee
assistance programs or human resources departments, out of fear of
looking weak or even harming the company's reputation.
Next page >

July 24, 2003.
|
|