| |
 |
 Appeared in TIME Magazine.
Drugs have become increasingly popular for
treating kids with mood and behavior problems.
But how will that affect them in the long run?
Getting by is hard enough in middle school. it's harder still
when you've got other things on your mind—and Andrea Okeson,
13, had plenty to distract her. There were the constant
stomach pains to consider; there was the nervousness, the
distractibility, the overwhelming need to be alone. And, of
course, there was the business of repeatedly checking the
locks on the doors. All these things grew, inexplicably, to
consume Andrea, until by the time she was through with the
eighth grade, she seemed pretty much through with everything
else too. "Andrea," said a teacher to her one day, "you look
like death."
The problem, though neither Andrea nor her teacher knew it,
was that her adolescent brain was being tossed by the
neurochemical storms of generalized anxiety,
obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)—a decidedly
lousy trifecta. If that was what eighth grade was, ninth was
unimaginable.
But that was then. Andrea, now 18, is a freshman at the
College of St. Catherine in St. Paul, Minn., enjoying her
friends and her studies and looking forward to a career in
fashion merchandising, all thanks to a bit of chemical
stabilizing provided by a pair of pills: Lexapro, an
antidepressant, and Adderall, a relatively new anti-ADHD drug.
"I feel excited about things," Andrea says. "I feel like I got
me back."
So a little medicine fixed what ailed a child. Good news all
around, right? Well, yes—and no. Lexapro is the perfect answer
for anxiety all right, provided you're willing to overlook the
fact that it does its work by artificially manipulating the
very chemicals responsible for feeling and thought. Adderall
is the perfect answer for ADHD, provided you overlook the fact
that it's a stimulant like Dexedrine. Oh, yes, you also have
to overlook the fact that the Adderall has left Andrea with
such side effects as weight loss and sleeplessness, and both
drugs are being poured into a young brain that has years to go
before it's finally fully formed. Still, says Andrea, "I'm
just glad there were things that could be done."
Those things—whether Lexapro or Ritalin or Prozac or something
else—are being done for more and more American children. In
fact, they are being done with such frequency that some people
have justifiably begun to ask, Are we raising Generation Rx?
Just a few years ago, psychologists couldn't say with
certainty that kids were even capable of suffering from
depression the same way adults do. Now, according to PhRMA, a
pharmaceutical trade group, up to 10% of all American kids may
suffer from some mental illness. Perhaps twice that many have
exhibited some symptoms of depression.
Up to a million others may suffer from the alternately
depressive and manic mood swings of bipolar disorder (BPD),
one more condition that was thought until recently to be an
affliction of adults alone. ADHD rates are exploding too.
According to a Mayo Clinic study, children between 5 and 19
have at least a 7.5% chance of being found to have ADHD, which
amounts to nearly 5 million kids. Other children are receiving
diagnoses and medication for obsessive-compulsive disorder,
social-anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD), pathological impulsiveness, sleeplessness, phobias and
more.
Has the world—and American society in particular—simply become
a more destabilizing place in which to raise children?
Probably so. But other factors are at work, including
sharp-eyed parents and doctors with a rising awareness of
childhood mental illness and what can be done for it. "While
we don't know exactly why the incidence of psychopathology is
increasing in children and adolescents, it probably has to do
with better diagnosis and detection," says Dr. Ronald Brown,
professor of pediatrics at the Medical University of South
Carolina.
Also feeding the trend for more diagnoses is the arrival of
whole new classes of psychotropic drugs with fewer side
effects and greater efficacy than earlier medications,
particularly the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
(SSRIS), or antidepressants. These have been rolled out with
highly visible, to-the-consumer ad campaigns.
While an earlier generation of antidepressants—tricyclics like
Tofranil—didn't work in kids, SSRIS do. According to a study
by Professor Julie Zito of the University of Maryland School
of Pharmacy, use of antidepressants among children and teens
increased threefold between 1987 and 1996. And that use
continues to climb. Nobody, not even the drug companies,
argues that pills alone are the ideal answer to mental
illness. Most experts believe that drugs are most effective
when combined with talk therapy or other counseling.
Nonetheless, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry now lists dozens of medications available for
troubled kids, from the comparatively familiar Ritalin (for
ADHD) to Zoloft and Celexa (for depression) to less familiar
ones like Seroquel, Tegretol, Depakote (for bipolar disorder),
and more are coming along all the time. There are stimulants,
mood stabilizers, sleep medications, antidepressants,
anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, antianxieties and narrowcast
drugs to deal with impulsiveness and post-traumatic
flashbacks. A few of the newest meds were developed or
approved specifically for kids. The majority have been okayed
for adults only, but are being used "off label" for younger
and younger patients at children's menu doses. The practice is
common and perfectly legal but potentially risky. "We know
that kids are not just little adults," says Dr. David Fassler,
professor of psychiatry at the University of Vermont. "They
metabolize medications differently."
Within the medical community—to say nothing of the families of
the troubled kids—concern is growing about just what
psychotropic drugs can do to still developing brains. Few
people deny that mind pills help—ask the untold numbers who
have climbed out of depressive pits or shaken off bipolar fits
thanks to modern pharmacology. But few deny either that we're
a quick-fix culture, and if you give us a feel-good answer to
a complicated problem, we'll use it with little thought of
long-term consequences.
"The problem," warns Dr. Glen Elliott, director of the Langley
Porter Psychiatric Institute's children's center at the
University of California, San Francisco, "is that our usage
has outstripped our knowledge base. Let's face it, we're
experimenting on these kids without tracking the results."
Next page >

November 2003.
|
|