| |
 |
 Appeared in NYT.
By FLOYD NORRIS
One flower may not prove the winter is over, but yesterday's
employment report provided a strong indication that the economy is
in an accelerating recovery.
The surge in employment was greater than most economists had
expected, including gains in October and higher counts than
previously reported for both August and September.
"At business cycle turning points, upward revisions are the rule,"
said Robert J. Barbera, the chief economist of ITG/Hoenig. "You can
be pretty confident that the initial estimate for October will be
revised upward, as well."
The growth in employment now appears to have begun in August, as tax
rebate checks were being received and cashed by millions of American
parents. Those checks were the driving force in a surge in retail
sales, which provided the demand that seems to have led some
businesses to start hiring.
The pickup in the American economy has been mirrored elsewhere.
Economic numbers in recent weeks have been better in most
industrialized societies. Central banks in Australia and Britain
even decided to raise interest rates this week, citing fears that
their economies were starting to overheat. And some economists were
quick to forecast that the Federal Reserve would soon follow suit,
perhaps as early as its January meeting.
To some economists, the surge in growth should not come as a
surprise. Both the Federal Reserve, through a sustained campaign to
lower interest rates, and the government, through a combination of
spending increases and tax cuts, have taken the actions intended to
stimulate economic growth.
But there has been so much talk of a "jobless recovery" that some
skeptics had concluded that no increase in employment was likely.
And that made the impact of the employment numbers greater than
might have been the case otherwise. The Labor Department found there
were 270,000 more jobs in October than it counted a month ago when
it released the September report.
"The lesson is that macroeconomic policy is powerful, even though it
sometimes works with a lag," said Richard Hoey, the chief economist
of the Dreyfus Corporation. "The economic cycle is back."
By no means are the current job numbers especially impressive. The
government says that 130.13 million Americans were employed in
October, fewer than the number working in February of this year and
down 1.8 percent — or 2.4 million jobs — from the peak of 132.56
million registered in February 2001.
But the direction seems clear. One statistic compiled by the
government is an index of hours worked in the private sector of the
economy. Using a three-month moving average to smooth out volatility
in the data, that figure is now showing an increase in hours worked
for the first time since the end of 2000. It is rising at a 1.1
percent annual rate. At the low, in November 2001 — when the
recession officially ended — the number of hours worked was falling
at an annual rate of 5.4 percent.
"The number of people working is rising, and the workweek is
rising," Mr. Barbera said. "Going from an economy on life support
from mortgage refinancings and tax cuts to a self-sustaining
recovery requires growing jobs to generate income."
There is not yet conclusive evidence that the economy has made that
transition, but the fact that job growth ran ahead of schedule is an
indication that it probably is. Retail sales are less impressive
than they were when the tax rebate checks were being cashed this
summer, but that is to be expected.
One sign of the beginning of a recovery is the rise in the number of
temporary jobs. Companies often hire temporary workers when business
picks up, since they need help but are concerned that the need may
be temporary. The latest numbers show that the economy has gained
286,000 jobs since employment hit bottom in July. Of that total, 19
percent have been in the form of temporary employment.
By contrast, in the final months of the economic expansion that
ended in early 2001, the number of temporary jobs was declining even
as overall employment was growing. In that case, employers facing
weakening demand chose to drop temporary workers first.
The extent to which the recently created temporary jobs are replaced
by full-time jobs in coming months will be one clue to whether the
recovery is really gaining speed.
The unemployment rate fell to 6 percent in October, down from a peak
of 6.4 percent in June but still far above the low of 3.9 percent
reached in December 2000. The rate would have gone higher save for
the fact that some people dropped out of the labor market, and
therefore were not counted as unemployed.
By September, noted John F. Vail, senior strategist of Mizuho
Securities USA, just 66.08 percent of the adult population was in
the work force, either employed or unemployed. That was a 10-year
low, but it ticked up to 66.11 percent in October. "As this number
picks up, it will keep the unemployment rate from falling too low,
as more people look for jobs," he said.

November 8, 2003.
|
|